Archive for September, 2007
Friday, September 28th, 2007
Well… the week isn’t over YET! I’m actually disclosing this vulnerability because Google has already fixed it. Although I don’t use Google Docs (because I’m a paranoid guy), I know a lot of people who do and I didn’t want to put their docs at risk. Without further delay, the details…
This vulnerability allowed any Google Docs user to STEAL ARBITRARY DOCUMENTS from the Google Docs Server. The basis of the vulnerability stems from a simple Session Management issue. Once a user has logged into Google Docs and has created a document, they are presented with several options. Under the “Share” tab, the user has an option to “Email Collaborators”
Once the user clicks the “Email Collaborators” link, the following HTTP GET request is made to docs.google.com:
GET /Dialogs/EmailDocument?DocID=<ANY DOC ID HERE> HTTP/1.1
<appropriate HTTP headers here>
POST /MiscCommands HTTP/1.1
<appropriate HTTP headers here>
command=validate_address&docid=<ANY DOCID HERE>&addr=gmail%40gmail.com&finis=true&POST_TOKEN=POSTTOKENVALUE
If you changed the DocID in the POST request, the entire contents of that document would be emailed to the addresses specified in the “addr” parameter! I tested this against several friends Google Docs and it worked EVERYTIME!
This issue does stem on being able to predict the DocID for the document that you want to steal. At first glance, the DocID seems to be a fairly stout “random string”, but a little bit of analysis shows some interesting characteristics. It seems that the DocID is delimited by an “_” character. The characters preceding the underscore represent the Google Docs UserID. Each document uploaded to Google Docs by a particular user will have the same characters up to the underscore. Now… what about the characters after the underscore? Well… take a look at what happens when I generate 10 different DocIDs in rapid succession:
Maybe the last set of characters isn’t as “random” as we thought…… Throw in some DocID enumeration (which exists) and we may be on to something here… I’ve seen Session Management issues like this in MANY of the web applications I’ve assessed. If your hired gun (webapp pentester) looks at you funny when you ask if they are testing for Session Management issues, FIND A NEW ONE! There isn’t a web app vulnerability scanner on the market that can detect this and Web App firewalls will not prevent this either! It takes an actual brain and some experience to find these types of issues!
In closing, I would like to give a shout to the Google Security Team. If you’ve ever dealt with the Google Security Team, you know that they take security seriously and they move fast…. VERY FAST. After giving them the details for a couple of Google vulnerabilities, it took Google ONE DAY to fix the issues and to deploy the fixes worldwide… Kudos to Chris and the GST.
Wednesday, September 26th, 2007
The whole concept of “Taking Ownership” of someone else’s content can be VERY dangerous. The reason taking ownership of content is so scary is because the ENTIRE trust model for the World Wide Web is basically built on ONE thing… the DOMAIN NAME.
This is why issues like XSS on sites like google.com are such a big deal… XSS basically allows an attacker to execute client side code in the context of the vulnerable domain. Malicious client side script is one thing… but malicious client side script executed in the context of a trusted domain is something entirely different… but I digress…
Google Documents basically allows you to upload your documents (aka content) to a Google server. Once you’ve uploaded the document, Google has essentially “taken ownership” of the document (content). There are ways to minimize the risks associated with taking ownership of content and it seems that Google has taken some measures to sanitize for XSS… but it seems that their focus on XSS may have caused them to miss a different type of cross domain exposure.
Flash Players (>126.96.36.199) support a new method for making cross domain requests. This method allows a user (or attacker) to specify where a crossdomain.xml file is located on a particular server. Essentially, if the flash player finds this crossdomain file (and the file is properly formatted) the flash player will allow cross domain requests to the domain that “owns” the crossdomain policy file, in this case… Google.com. We talked about issues like this at our DEFCON talk…. but I guess Google missed out.
So, the Proof of Concept works like this:
- NO XSS IS REQUIRED!
- Create a Google Docs Account and upload a properly formatted Crossdomain.xml file
- Once the file is uploaded, you publish the file, exposing the file to every authenticated Google.com user.
- Create a flash object on a malicious server, pointing the System.security.loadPolicyFile() to the document that you uploaded to Google Docs.
- Once the Flash object has read the contents of the crossdomain file from the Google server, it assumes that Google has allowed cross domain requests (I mean… who in their right mind would allow random people to upload random files to thier server and serve that content under the context of their trusted domain name?).
- Now, the flash object has full access to the google.com domain and can steal all your Google information.
Proof of Concept can be found here. The PoC just displays your contact list, but I have full access to the Google.com domain, so the sky is the limit (aka I can read all your email too)… I left out one key step needed to pull this off and the source for the Flash applet will not be published at this time in order to slow the kiddies.
If anyone from Google Security comes across this page, send me an email and we can go over the missing step as well as the Flash Source… I’d also like to talk to you about another hole in Google Docs that allows me to ACCESS ANY ARBITRARY USERS DOCUMENTS.
Monday, September 24th, 2007
In celebration of our acceptance to Black Hat Japan, we’ve decided to post the details on our Picasa exploit which allows an attacker to steal images from victims. Perhaps this should be the month of Google flaws considering our posts in this previous week and some of the posts that are on their way in the next week or two.
If you’ve read our previous post Say Cheese! then you know that Google’s Picasa registers the picasa:// URI in the Windows registry and it is possible to abuse this registered URI through a Cross-Site Scripting exposure to steal a victim’s images. My personal feeling on this issue is that it represents a HUGE privacy breach for users of Picasa. Ok, so without further dramatic build-up, you can find the gory details here and you can find the source code we use for the exploit here.